<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 129 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision disallowing the cenvat credit on outward transportation service. It held that the demand was hit by limitation as the appellant had not suppressed facts and had taken the credit in good faith. The ruling emphasized the importance of proper record-keeping and compliance with statutory requirements in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 129 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the decision disallowing the cenvat credit on outward transportation service. It held that the demand was hit by limitation as the appellant had not suppressed facts and had taken the credit in good faith. The ruling emphasized the importance of proper record-keeping and compliance with statutory requirements in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>