https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301403 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, overturning the rejection of refund applications for service tax paid on input services. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant in pharmaceutical development qualified as an export of service, entitling them to the refund. This decision was influenced by a previous ruling where a similar service contract was deemed as an export of service, setting a precedent for the current case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and granted the refund to the appellant. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:12:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301403 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, overturning the rejection of refund applications for service tax paid on input services. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant in pharmaceutical development qualified as an export of service, entitling them to the refund. This decision was influenced by a previous ruling where a similar service contract was deemed as an export of service, setting a precedent for the current case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and granted the refund to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 24 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301403