<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1989 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order due to lack of jurisdiction resulting from the improper issuance of the notice u/s 143(2) beyond the statutory period. It partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of substantiating financial transactions and sources of income to avoid unwarranted additions. The assessment order was deemed legally unsustainable due to the jurisdictional error caused by the delayed issuance of the notice u/s 143(2), leading to its quashing based on this procedural irregularity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1989 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order due to lack of jurisdiction resulting from the improper issuance of the notice u/s 143(2) beyond the statutory period. It partially allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of substantiating financial transactions and sources of income to avoid unwarranted additions. The assessment order was deemed legally unsustainable due to the jurisdictional error caused by the delayed issuance of the notice u/s 143(2), leading to its quashing based on this procedural irregularity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>