https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301413 Because the creditor's claim continued to rest on the original settlement amount, with sums already received during the proceedings taken into account in the recovery determination, the appellate pre-deposit requirement under Section 21 could not be insisted upon merely because payment was received before final order. The High Court found the tribunal's approach to pre-deposit incorrect, held that no further deposit was justified, and directed that the appeal be heard on the merits along with the connected appeals and cross-appeals. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:12:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301413 Because the creditor's claim continued to rest on the original settlement amount, with sums already received during the proceedings taken into account in the recovery determination, the appellate pre-deposit requirement under Section 21 could not be insisted upon merely because payment was received before final order. The High Court found the tribunal's approach to pre-deposit incorrect, held that no further deposit was justified, and directed that the appeal be heard on the merits along with the connected appeals and cross-appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301413