<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2012 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301412</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to reassessment, tax and penalty was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available and had not been used. The Court found no proof of any written or acknowledged request for the assessment documents, so the alleged breach of natural justice was not established. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appellate remedy, with the statutory right of appeal under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act preserved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2012 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301412</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to reassessment, tax and penalty was not entertained because an effective statutory appeal was available and had not been used. The Court found no proof of any written or acknowledged request for the assessment documents, so the alleged breach of natural justice was not established. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the appellate remedy, with the statutory right of appeal under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act preserved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>