<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1780 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301408</link>
    <description>The High Court reversed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing lack of evidence of undisclosed income and satisfactory explanations for advances received. The Court found errors in the service of notice under section 143(2) but remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for further consideration. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of disallowance and allowance of the appeal were set aside, and the case was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:12:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1780 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301408</link>
      <description>The High Court reversed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, citing lack of evidence of undisclosed income and satisfactory explanations for advances received. The Court found errors in the service of notice under section 143(2) but remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for further consideration. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of disallowance and allowance of the appeal were set aside, and the case was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>