https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301415 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an effective statutory appeal is available in fiscal matters, and a mere allegation of breach of natural justice does not by itself justify bypassing that remedy when the same grounds can be raised before the appellate authority. The Madras HC noted that the appellant had an appellate remedy under Section 51 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and should pursue that route. The writ appeal was therefore not entertained on merits, and the appellant was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:12:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301415 Writ jurisdiction is ordinarily not exercised where an effective statutory appeal is available in fiscal matters, and a mere allegation of breach of natural justice does not by itself justify bypassing that remedy when the same grounds can be raised before the appellate authority. The Madras HC noted that the appellant had an appellate remedy under Section 51 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and should pursue that route. The writ appeal was therefore not entertained on merits, and the appellant was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301415