https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420457 A second complaint styled as a supplementary complaint during the pendency of an earlier complaint on the same allegations was treated as prima facie impermissible under Section 299 CrPC where the accused had already been proceeded against on the first complaint and had appeared pursuant to earlier court directions. The Court noted that the later complaint could revive coercive steps such as search, seizure, and arrest, even though the material on record did not show abscondence. Further proceedings under the supplementary complaint were stayed. en-us Tue, 15 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 18:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420457 A second complaint styled as a supplementary complaint during the pendency of an earlier complaint on the same allegations was treated as prima facie impermissible under Section 299 CrPC where the accused had already been proceeded against on the first complaint and had appeared pursuant to earlier court directions. The Court noted that the later complaint could revive coercive steps such as search, seizure, and arrest, even though the material on record did not show abscondence. Further proceedings under the supplementary complaint were stayed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 15 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420457