<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST ON TDR PRIOR TO 01.04.2019</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117885</link>
    <description>For TDR arising from a development agreement predating 01.04.2019 where the builder retained old rates, transition uncertainty exists and some AARs widen GST liability. The advisory view is that the transaction should not attract the Reverse Charge Mechanism; instead the builder/developer is liable under Forward Charge Mechanism for GST on the supply, while TDR should not be treated under RCM and any landowner liability is contingent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:27:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST ON TDR PRIOR TO 01.04.2019</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117885</link>
      <description>For TDR arising from a development agreement predating 01.04.2019 where the builder retained old rates, transition uncertainty exists and some AARs widen GST liability. The advisory view is that the transaction should not attract the Reverse Charge Mechanism; instead the builder/developer is liable under Forward Charge Mechanism for GST on the supply, while TDR should not be treated under RCM and any landowner liability is contingent.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:27:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>