<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Grants Refund for Unutilized ITC Due to Inverted Tax Structure, Overruling Restrictive Board Circular Interpretation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62744</link>
    <description>Refund of the unutilized ITC accumulated on account of inverted tax structure - refund claimed on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies - By way of the circular, the Board is curtailing the said benefit and making refund permissible only if the input and output supplies are different. - The respondent authority ought not to reject the claim of the petitioners relying on the circular as the prayer made by the petitioners is permissible under the Act - it is held that the petitioners will be entitled to the refund as claimed - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 15:27:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 15:27:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Grants Refund for Unutilized ITC Due to Inverted Tax Structure, Overruling Restrictive Board Circular Interpretation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62744</link>
      <description>Refund of the unutilized ITC accumulated on account of inverted tax structure - refund claimed on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than the rate of tax on output supplies - By way of the circular, the Board is curtailing the said benefit and making refund permissible only if the input and output supplies are different. - The respondent authority ought not to reject the claim of the petitioners relying on the circular as the prayer made by the petitioners is permissible under the Act - it is held that the petitioners will be entitled to the refund as claimed - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 15:27:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>