<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28485</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the validity and legal consequences of the assessee&#039;s act of impressing a moiety of his partnership shares with the character of joint family property. The question of law was answered in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee, entitling him to costs and a counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:20:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28485</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the validity and legal consequences of the assessee&#039;s act of impressing a moiety of his partnership shares with the character of joint family property. The question of law was answered in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee, entitling him to costs and a counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>