<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 119 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420453</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under the CGST Act, the Rajasthan HC treated the alleged tax evasion as a serious economic offence and considered the gravity of the accusation, the scale of the alleged evasion, and the position of a similarly placed co-accused. On that basis, the Court found no sufficient ground to grant bail under Section 439 CrPC, and bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 119 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420453</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under the CGST Act, the Rajasthan HC treated the alleged tax evasion as a serious economic offence and considered the gravity of the accusation, the scale of the alleged evasion, and the position of a similarly placed co-accused. On that basis, the Court found no sufficient ground to grant bail under Section 439 CrPC, and bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>