<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 110 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420444</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment and consideration of crucial issues like the claim under section 54F, capital gains computation, income from property, and unexplained cash deposits. The decision aimed to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice and thorough review of the relevant facts and submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 110 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420444</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fair assessment and consideration of crucial issues like the claim under section 54F, capital gains computation, income from property, and unexplained cash deposits. The decision aimed to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice and thorough review of the relevant facts and submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>