<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420439</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the addition made by the Centralized Processing Centre under Section 143(1) for delayed payment of employees&#039; contribution towards Provident Fund and Employees&#039; State Insurance was deleted. The Tribunal held that if the contributions are paid before the due date for filing the return of income, they are allowable as deductions under Section 43B. The decision was based on judicial precedents and principles favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 08:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 105 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420439</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the addition made by the Centralized Processing Centre under Section 143(1) for delayed payment of employees&#039; contribution towards Provident Fund and Employees&#039; State Insurance was deleted. The Tribunal held that if the contributions are paid before the due date for filing the return of income, they are allowable as deductions under Section 43B. The decision was based on judicial precedents and principles favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>