<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not be levied due to the lack of specificity in the penalty notices. The judgment emphasized the necessity of clear and unambiguous notices in penalty proceedings for fairness and justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 08:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) could not be levied due to the lack of specificity in the penalty notices. The judgment emphasized the necessity of clear and unambiguous notices in penalty proceedings for fairness and justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>