https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420415 The tribunal dismissed the petition as the appellant lacked legal standing, failed to provide evidence of fraud or mismanagement, and did not justify the significant delay in filing. Emphasizing the importance of substantial evidence and timely action, the tribunal closed the application without costs, citing the inapplicability of Section 213 of the Companies Act, 2013 due to the lack of evidence and delay. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Apr 2022 11:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420415 The tribunal dismissed the petition as the appellant lacked legal standing, failed to provide evidence of fraud or mismanagement, and did not justify the significant delay in filing. Emphasizing the importance of substantial evidence and timely action, the tribunal closed the application without costs, citing the inapplicability of Section 213 of the Companies Act, 2013 due to the lack of evidence and delay. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420415