<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 72 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the original authority&#039;s decision. It concluded that the appellant had no further liability to reverse the credit for the disputed period. The Tribunal appreciated the detailed calculations provided by the appellant&#039;s representative, ultimately leading to a judgment in favor of the appellant on 31.3.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 72 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the original authority&#039;s decision. It concluded that the appellant had no further liability to reverse the credit for the disputed period. The Tribunal appreciated the detailed calculations provided by the appellant&#039;s representative, ultimately leading to a judgment in favor of the appellant on 31.3.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>