<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1224 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301387</link>
    <description>Reliefs and concessions under clause 8 of a modified rehabilitation scheme applied throughout the rehabilitation period, rather than being confined to electrical breakdown periods. The scheme&#039;s revival purpose, surrounding clauses, and subsequent Board directions supported reading &quot;break-down/rehabilitation&quot; broadly. References elsewhere to the rehabilitation period, together with the Note Sheet and later BIFR order, confirmed that the concession was not limited to isolated breakdowns. Rehabilitation-related benefits in a sanctioned scheme must be construed holistically; a narrow literal interpretation cannot restrict benefits where the scheme and authoritative clarification establish broader coverage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 20:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1224 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301387</link>
      <description>Reliefs and concessions under clause 8 of a modified rehabilitation scheme applied throughout the rehabilitation period, rather than being confined to electrical breakdown periods. The scheme&#039;s revival purpose, surrounding clauses, and subsequent Board directions supported reading &quot;break-down/rehabilitation&quot; broadly. References elsewhere to the rehabilitation period, together with the Note Sheet and later BIFR order, confirmed that the concession was not limited to isolated breakdowns. Rehabilitation-related benefits in a sanctioned scheme must be construed holistically; a narrow literal interpretation cannot restrict benefits where the scheme and authoritative clarification establish broader coverage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>