<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1965 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301388</link>
    <description>A suo motu revision under Rule 80 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules was described as unsustainable because it rested entirely on an earlier Tribunal view that was later displaced by a Division Bench ruling. The later ruling clarified that incentive notification benefits operated in addition to statutory tax concessions and required reassessment without treating the incentive exemption as excluded. With the legal foundation for revision removed, the consequential reassessment could not stand and the revisional action was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 20:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1965 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301388</link>
      <description>A suo motu revision under Rule 80 of the Orissa Sales Tax Rules was described as unsustainable because it rested entirely on an earlier Tribunal view that was later displaced by a Division Bench ruling. The later ruling clarified that incentive notification benefits operated in addition to statutory tax concessions and required reassessment without treating the incentive exemption as excluded. With the legal foundation for revision removed, the consequential reassessment could not stand and the revisional action was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>