<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1945 (7) TMI 15 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301378</link>
    <description>In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappraise the whole evidence and reverse the acquittal if the evidence justifies that course. The High Court had examined the trial judge&#039;s reasons for rejecting witness testimony in detail, so it was not shown to have relied on evidence without proper consideration. No miscarriage of justice or comparable ground for interference was established, and the dismissal of the appeal was therefore warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 16:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1945 (7) TMI 15 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301378</link>
      <description>In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappraise the whole evidence and reverse the acquittal if the evidence justifies that course. The High Court had examined the trial judge&#039;s reasons for rejecting witness testimony in detail, so it was not shown to have relied on evidence without proper consideration. No miscarriage of justice or comparable ground for interference was established, and the dismissal of the appeal was therefore warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>