<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 45 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420379</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the Black Money Act&#039;s constitutional validity by directing respondent no.1 to provide a hearing and a reasoned order on jurisdictional objections. The petitioner was granted time to respond to the show-cause notice if necessary, without the need for a separate notice. The Court kept all jurisdiction and merits contentions open and did not award costs in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:34:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 45 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420379</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the Black Money Act&#039;s constitutional validity by directing respondent no.1 to provide a hearing and a reasoned order on jurisdictional objections. The petitioner was granted time to respond to the show-cause notice if necessary, without the need for a separate notice. The Court kept all jurisdiction and merits contentions open and did not award costs in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>