<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 42 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420376</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay quashed the impugned order passed by respondent No. 3, directing a fresh consideration of the objections raised by the petitioner in accordance with the law and established legal principles. The Court emphasized the importance of providing detailed reasoning and addressing each objection raised by the assessee. The respondent No. 3 was instructed to reevaluate the matter within a specified timeframe and communicate the decision to the petitioner promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 42 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420376</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay quashed the impugned order passed by respondent No. 3, directing a fresh consideration of the objections raised by the petitioner in accordance with the law and established legal principles. The Court emphasized the importance of providing detailed reasoning and addressing each objection raised by the assessee. The respondent No. 3 was instructed to reevaluate the matter within a specified timeframe and communicate the decision to the petitioner promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>