<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 41 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420375</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the legality of the search and warrant of authorization under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, along with the panchnama, assessment order, and demand notices. It found that the material provided by the Revenue constituted sufficient &#039;reasons to believe&#039; for the action taken, justifying the exercise of power under Section 132. The Court allowed the petitioner the liberty to challenge the orders through appropriate proceedings but did not interfere with the action under Section 132.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 41 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420375</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the legality of the search and warrant of authorization under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, along with the panchnama, assessment order, and demand notices. It found that the material provided by the Revenue constituted sufficient &#039;reasons to believe&#039; for the action taken, justifying the exercise of power under Section 132. The Court allowed the petitioner the liberty to challenge the orders through appropriate proceedings but did not interfere with the action under Section 132.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>