<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 34 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420368</link>
    <description>Trade creditor balances supported by creditor confirmations, purchase registers, ledger accounts, bank records and DVAT returns could not be treated as unexplained credits where the Assessing Officer made no effective verification and produced no adverse material; the addition under section 68 was therefore deleted. Marketing payments to a non-resident advertising service provider were not subject to withholding where the recipient had no permanent establishment in India and no material showed the payment was taxable in India; the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was accordingly deleted. The appellate relief on both issues was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:33:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 34 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420368</link>
      <description>Trade creditor balances supported by creditor confirmations, purchase registers, ledger accounts, bank records and DVAT returns could not be treated as unexplained credits where the Assessing Officer made no effective verification and produced no adverse material; the addition under section 68 was therefore deleted. Marketing payments to a non-resident advertising service provider were not subject to withholding where the recipient had no permanent establishment in India and no material showed the payment was taxable in India; the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was accordingly deleted. The appellate relief on both issues was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>