<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 26 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and directed the lower authorities to re-examine the issues, provide a fair hearing to the appellant, and consider the additional evidence presented during the proceedings. The case was remanded back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for reconsideration in light of the reconciliation provided by the appellant to explain the undisclosed income computed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 26 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and directed the lower authorities to re-examine the issues, provide a fair hearing to the appellant, and consider the additional evidence presented during the proceedings. The case was remanded back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for reconsideration in light of the reconciliation provided by the appellant to explain the undisclosed income computed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>