<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 17 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made to the assessee&#039;s income under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that since the assessee did not claim any expenditure or allowance related to the sundry creditors in question, the provision of section 41(1) could not be applied. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the addition by the Assessing Officer was set aside. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on 02-12-2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 17 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made to the assessee&#039;s income under section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that since the assessee did not claim any expenditure or allowance related to the sundry creditors in question, the provision of section 41(1) could not be applied. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the addition by the Assessing Officer was set aside. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on 02-12-2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>