<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 15 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420349</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the impugned demand orders, citing the binding nature of the resolution plan post-approval under Section 31 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court emphasized that all dues, including statutory ones, not included in the plan would stand extinguished. Parties were advised to seek legal remedies if necessary, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 15 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420349</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, quashing the impugned demand orders, citing the binding nature of the resolution plan post-approval under Section 31 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court emphasized that all dues, including statutory ones, not included in the plan would stand extinguished. Parties were advised to seek legal remedies if necessary, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>