<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 4 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420338</link>
    <description>Statutory priority under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act protects a registered secured creditor&#039;s charge over movable and immovable assets against recovery of tax arrears. Where the bank&#039;s security interest was undisputed, the recovery forum could not proceed without issuing notice to the secured creditor. The contrary order refusing impleadment of the bank was therefore unsustainable, and recovery was permitted to continue only after notice to the secured creditor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 08:31:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 4 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420338</link>
      <description>Statutory priority under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act protects a registered secured creditor&#039;s charge over movable and immovable assets against recovery of tax arrears. Where the bank&#039;s security interest was undisputed, the recovery forum could not proceed without issuing notice to the secured creditor. The contrary order refusing impleadment of the bank was therefore unsustainable, and recovery was permitted to continue only after notice to the secured creditor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>