<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 715 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301375</link>
    <description>The Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal by the Council-Appellant challenging the re-examination order of an answer script in English Paper 1 of the Madhyamik Examination. The Court emphasized the need for statutory provisions for re-assessment, highlighting the importance of maintaining finality in public examination results. The judgment quashed the orders directing re-examination, emphasizing the significance of a robust evaluation system to uphold the integrity and finality of examination results.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 715 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301375</link>
      <description>The Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal by the Council-Appellant challenging the re-examination order of an answer script in English Paper 1 of the Madhyamik Examination. The Court emphasized the need for statutory provisions for re-assessment, highlighting the importance of maintaining finality in public examination results. The judgment quashed the orders directing re-examination, emphasizing the significance of a robust evaluation system to uphold the integrity and finality of examination results.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>