https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301372 The court held that the petitioner-employer must fulfill statutory obligations under the Employees State Insurance Act without imposing additional conditions. Settlements between management and union representatives cannot override statutory provisions. The request for a writ of mandamus to delay ESI Act implementation was denied, emphasizing the Act's broader benefits beyond just hospital facilities. The court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the validity of show-cause notices issued by ESI authorities. en-us Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301372 The court held that the petitioner-employer must fulfill statutory obligations under the Employees State Insurance Act without imposing additional conditions. Settlements between management and union representatives cannot override statutory provisions. The request for a writ of mandamus to delay ESI Act implementation was denied, emphasizing the Act's broader benefits beyond just hospital facilities. The court dismissed the writ petitions, affirming the validity of show-cause notices issued by ESI authorities. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301372