<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 352 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301370</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The Court upheld the first two directions of the learned Single Judge regarding the grant of pay scales to RHJS officers but set aside the third direction concerning the grant of supertime scale to seven RHJS officers. The Court emphasized the superiority of RHJS over RJS and directed the State Government to grant appropriate pay scales to RHJS officers, ensuring compliance with Article 14 of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 352 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301370</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The Court upheld the first two directions of the learned Single Judge regarding the grant of pay scales to RHJS officers but set aside the third direction concerning the grant of supertime scale to seven RHJS officers. The Court emphasized the superiority of RHJS over RJS and directed the State Government to grant appropriate pay scales to RHJS officers, ensuring compliance with Article 14 of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>