https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301370 Unequal pay fixation within the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service was found constitutionally vulnerable because a superior service had been placed on the same footing as a lower service, attracting arbitrariness under Articles 14 and 16. The Court accepted judicial correction of that anomaly and treated the revised ordinary and selection scales as requiring alignment with the service hierarchy and the governing Rules. However, writ jurisdiction could not be used to create a new supertime scale or to prescribe postings for named officers, since such matters belonged to the administrative domain and the State's consideration. The decision therefore distinguishes permissible correction of discriminatory pay structures from impermissible judicial creation of service grades. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301370 Unequal pay fixation within the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service was found constitutionally vulnerable because a superior service had been placed on the same footing as a lower service, attracting arbitrariness under Articles 14 and 16. The Court accepted judicial correction of that anomaly and treated the revised ordinary and selection scales as requiring alignment with the service hierarchy and the governing Rules. However, writ jurisdiction could not be used to create a new supertime scale or to prescribe postings for named officers, since such matters belonged to the administrative domain and the State's consideration. The decision therefore distinguishes permissible correction of discriminatory pay structures from impermissible judicial creation of service grades. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301370