<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1348 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption u/s.54 for purchasing a property in the son&#039;s name, following the precedent set by the jurisdictional High Court. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to binding precedents in tax matters, even in the presence of conflicting views from other High Courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 08:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1348 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of exemption u/s.54 for purchasing a property in the son&#039;s name, following the precedent set by the jurisdictional High Court. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to binding precedents in tax matters, even in the presence of conflicting views from other High Courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>