<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 42 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28453</link>
    <description>On transfer of an undertaking, section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act does not create retrenchment-compensation liability in the transferor where employees continue in service without interruption, retain no less favourable conditions, and the transferee assumes the compensation obligation on retrenchment based on continuous service. In that situation, the liability does not accrue to the transferor on the transfer date, and a book provision for such compensation is not an ascertained liability deductible in the relevant accounting year. The provision is therefore not allowable merely because it is recorded in the accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:20:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 42 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28453</link>
      <description>On transfer of an undertaking, section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act does not create retrenchment-compensation liability in the transferor where employees continue in service without interruption, retain no less favourable conditions, and the transferee assumes the compensation obligation on retrenchment based on continuous service. In that situation, the liability does not accrue to the transferor on the transfer date, and a book provision for such compensation is not an ascertained liability deductible in the relevant accounting year. The provision is therefore not allowable merely because it is recorded in the accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>