<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1326 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420288</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the Commissioner was directed to apply Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, considering the fresh test report and legal framework. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adherence to statutory jurisdictions and provided for the commercial interests of the appellant by allowing re-export.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1326 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420288</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the Commissioner was directed to apply Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962, considering the fresh test report and legal framework. The Tribunal emphasized the need for adherence to statutory jurisdictions and provided for the commercial interests of the appellant by allowing re-export.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>