https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420253 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the intimations demanding late fees under section 234E for the period in question. The judgment clarified that the jurisdiction to levy late fees under section 234E arose only from June 1, 2015, and not earlier, thereby granting relief to the petitioner based on the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions and legal precedents. en-us Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420253 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the intimations demanding late fees under section 234E for the period in question. The judgment clarified that the jurisdiction to levy late fees under section 234E arose only from June 1, 2015, and not earlier, thereby granting relief to the petitioner based on the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions and legal precedents. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420253