<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 23 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28441</link>
    <description>The High Court confirmed the validity of the service of notice under section 148 and the assessment made under section 147. Despite procedural irregularities in the service of notice, as the assessee received and complied with it, the Court deemed the service valid. The Court emphasized that the assessment was valid as the assessee participated in the proceedings without objection. The assessee was instructed to cover the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:53:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 23 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28441</link>
      <description>The High Court confirmed the validity of the service of notice under section 148 and the assessment made under section 147. Despite procedural irregularities in the service of notice, as the assessee received and complied with it, the Court deemed the service valid. The Court emphasized that the assessment was valid as the assessee participated in the proceedings without objection. The assessee was instructed to cover the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>