<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1267 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420229</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed and disposed of six applications seeking the appointment of an Alternate Director in place of an incapacitated individual. The Tribunal highlighted the need for addressing such matters internally before resorting to legal intervention, emphasizing the potential impact on the balance of previous orders. The applications were deemed infructuous, and the request for urgent hearings was consequently disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1267 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420229</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed and disposed of six applications seeking the appointment of an Alternate Director in place of an incapacitated individual. The Tribunal highlighted the need for addressing such matters internally before resorting to legal intervention, emphasizing the potential impact on the balance of previous orders. The applications were deemed infructuous, and the request for urgent hearings was consequently disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>