<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1545 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301353</link>
    <description>The appeal raised a substantial question of law on entitlement to refund of unutilized Cenvat credit where Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not expressly provide for such refund. The HC admitted the appeal on that question and listed it for hearing, leaving the merits open for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1545 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301353</link>
      <description>The appeal raised a substantial question of law on entitlement to refund of unutilized Cenvat credit where Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not expressly provide for such refund. The HC admitted the appeal on that question and listed it for hearing, leaving the merits open for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>