<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1582 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301355</link>
    <description>The appeal raised questions on the alleged perversity of the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings, the applicability of judicial notice concerning section 10(23C)(vi), and whether proceedings under Chapter XIV-B and section 158BC were mandatory and had been omitted from consideration. The Orissa HC admitted the appeal, directed issuance of notice to the opposite party, and listed the matter for further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 08:32:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1582 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301355</link>
      <description>The appeal raised questions on the alleged perversity of the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings, the applicability of judicial notice concerning section 10(23C)(vi), and whether proceedings under Chapter XIV-B and section 158BC were mandatory and had been omitted from consideration. The Orissa HC admitted the appeal, directed issuance of notice to the opposite party, and listed the matter for further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>