<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 42 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28433</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed issues concerning the application of Gross Profit rate, appeal against the order under section 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, and the duty of the ITO to allow the assessee to explain the delay in filing the registration application. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on the appealability of the order under section 184(7) but against the assessee regarding the delay in filing the registration application. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply a Gross Profit rate of 6% was upheld due to unverifiable purchases and sales, leading to the rejection of the firm&#039;s disclosed rate of 3.4%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:31:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 42 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28433</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed issues concerning the application of Gross Profit rate, appeal against the order under section 184(7) of the Income-tax Act, and the duty of the ITO to allow the assessee to explain the delay in filing the registration application. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee on the appealability of the order under section 184(7) but against the assessee regarding the delay in filing the registration application. The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to apply a Gross Profit rate of 6% was upheld due to unverifiable purchases and sales, leading to the rejection of the firm&#039;s disclosed rate of 3.4%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>