<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1243 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420205</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amount received by the assessee from his HUF is not taxable as a gift under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. Citing consistent decisions and the case of Pankil Garg v. PCIT, Karnal, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made by the A.O. and setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1243 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420205</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amount received by the assessee from his HUF is not taxable as a gift under Section 56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. Citing consistent decisions and the case of Pankil Garg v. PCIT, Karnal, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made by the A.O. and setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>