<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1240 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420202</link>
    <description>Relief by way of foreign tax credit under the India-Oman DTAA did not convert dividend income from the assessee&#039;s foreign PE into exempt income for section 14A purposes, so disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D was unsustainable and was deleted. On horticulture expenses, the tribunal held that a presumptive 10% disallowance for possible personal use, based only on the absence of a premise-wise or employee-wise log book, was not justified where the assessee showed the expenditure related to green belts and township maintenance and no specific material established personal use. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues and the additions were sustained as deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1240 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420202</link>
      <description>Relief by way of foreign tax credit under the India-Oman DTAA did not convert dividend income from the assessee&#039;s foreign PE into exempt income for section 14A purposes, so disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D was unsustainable and was deleted. On horticulture expenses, the tribunal held that a presumptive 10% disallowance for possible personal use, based only on the absence of a premise-wise or employee-wise log book, was not justified where the assessee showed the expenditure related to green belts and township maintenance and no specific material established personal use. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed on both issues and the additions were sustained as deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>