<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 1237 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the disallowance of employees&#039; contributions towards ESI &amp;amp; PF by the Assessing Officer to be unsustainable. The disallowance was based on the timing of deposit, which was before the due date of filing the return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act. The Tribunal considered judicial precedents and legislative intent, concluding that the disallowance was not warranted. As a result, the disallowance amounting to &amp;amp;8377;74,76,708/- was deleted, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:36:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 1237 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the disallowance of employees&#039; contributions towards ESI &amp;amp; PF by the Assessing Officer to be unsustainable. The disallowance was based on the timing of deposit, which was before the due date of filing the return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act. The Tribunal considered judicial precedents and legislative intent, concluding that the disallowance was not warranted. As a result, the disallowance amounting to &amp;amp;8377;74,76,708/- was deleted, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>