https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420191 The court dismissed the writ petition as the issue of ownership was deemed a disputed question of fact that could not be resolved through a writ petition. The court deferred the resolution of the ownership matter to the Department for adjudication, suggesting that the petitioner could pursue alternative legal avenues. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the arguments presented, focusing solely on the ownership dispute. en-us Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Mar 2022 21:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420191 The court dismissed the writ petition as the issue of ownership was deemed a disputed question of fact that could not be resolved through a writ petition. The court deferred the resolution of the ownership matter to the Department for adjudication, suggesting that the petitioner could pursue alternative legal avenues. The court refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the arguments presented, focusing solely on the ownership dispute. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420191