https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420188 SC held that its statutory appeal under Section 15Z is confined to questions of law, not routine factual reappraisal, and will not disturb Tribunal findings grounded in record-based inferences. The Tribunal's factual conclusions that the April 2005 advertisements and subsequent forex announcement were supported by pre-announcement steps, and that allegations of price and account manipulation lacked proved connectivity, are affirmed. The Tribunal's reversal of SEBI's finding on the first advertisement is left intact as a factual determination. The SC rejected a blanket right to cross-examination, setting that issue aside for future adjudication while upholding the Tribunal's decision on other grounds. en-us Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420188 SC held that its statutory appeal under Section 15Z is confined to questions of law, not routine factual reappraisal, and will not disturb Tribunal findings grounded in record-based inferences. The Tribunal's factual conclusions that the April 2005 advertisements and subsequent forex announcement were supported by pre-announcement steps, and that allegations of price and account manipulation lacked proved connectivity, are affirmed. The Tribunal's reversal of SEBI's finding on the first advertisement is left intact as a factual determination. The SC rejected a blanket right to cross-examination, setting that issue aside for future adjudication while upholding the Tribunal's decision on other grounds. Case-Laws SEBI Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420188