https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420184 The Tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the Corporate Debtor's defence was not spurious, frivolous, or vexatious. A pre-existing dispute existed, and the Operational Creditor failed to mention the date of default in the application, leading to the dismissal of the petition in C.P.(IB) No. 1628/KB/2019. en-us Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:35:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420184 The Tribunal dismissed the petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the Corporate Debtor's defence was not spurious, frivolous, or vexatious. A pre-existing dispute existed, and the Operational Creditor failed to mention the date of default in the application, leading to the dismissal of the petition in C.P.(IB) No. 1628/KB/2019. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420184