<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1663 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, CHHATTISGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301331</link>
    <description>Compulsory statutory contributions to the District Mineral Foundation and National Mineral Exploration Trust were treated as arising from mining operations and not as voluntary donations. The authority reasoned that the payments constituted consideration for an act of forbearance, namely tolerance of mining activity and its environmental impact, so they fell within the statutory concept of supply and consideration in the course or furtherance of business. It further applied the notified reverse charge entry for services involving Government-related bodies to a business entity and rejected the challenge to its inapplicability. The contributions were therefore considered liable to GST under reverse charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1663 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, CHHATTISGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301331</link>
      <description>Compulsory statutory contributions to the District Mineral Foundation and National Mineral Exploration Trust were treated as arising from mining operations and not as voluntary donations. The authority reasoned that the payments constituted consideration for an act of forbearance, namely tolerance of mining activity and its environmental impact, so they fell within the statutory concept of supply and consideration in the course or furtherance of business. It further applied the notified reverse charge entry for services involving Government-related bodies to a business entity and rejected the challenge to its inapplicability. The contributions were therefore considered liable to GST under reverse charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>