<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301338</link>
    <description>The Civil Court dismissed the defendants&#039; application to reject the plaint, ruling that the jurisdiction of Civil Courts is only ousted when matters are specifically empowered to be determined by a tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013. The judgment emphasized the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in cases of oppression and highlighted the plaintiff&#039;s right to seek redressal under Section 242 of the Act. The Court allowed the Civil Revision Petition, rejected the plaint, and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petition without costs, affirming the NCLT&#039;s exclusive authority in such disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 20:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1413 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301338</link>
      <description>The Civil Court dismissed the defendants&#039; application to reject the plaint, ruling that the jurisdiction of Civil Courts is only ousted when matters are specifically empowered to be determined by a tribunal under the Companies Act, 2013. The judgment emphasized the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in cases of oppression and highlighted the plaintiff&#039;s right to seek redressal under Section 242 of the Act. The Court allowed the Civil Revision Petition, rejected the plaint, and closed the connected Miscellaneous Petition without costs, affirming the NCLT&#039;s exclusive authority in such disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>