https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301345 The High Court clarified that the appeal challenging an order dated 28th October, 2021, was not disposed of and scheduled it for admission on 6th December, 2021. SEBI disputed claims of consenting to the order and was allowed to seek clarification from the Learned Single Judge regarding its involvement. The order's clauses on settlement confidentiality and suit disposal were based on the parties' compromise and peculiar circumstances, with consent from all parties. The urgency of the matter required prompt clarification on SEBI's alleged consent, directing the parties to approach the Learned Single Judge promptly. en-us Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Mar 2022 20:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301345 The High Court clarified that the appeal challenging an order dated 28th October, 2021, was not disposed of and scheduled it for admission on 6th December, 2021. SEBI disputed claims of consenting to the order and was allowed to seek clarification from the Learned Single Judge regarding its involvement. The order's clauses on settlement confidentiality and suit disposal were based on the parties' compromise and peculiar circumstances, with consent from all parties. The urgency of the matter required prompt clarification on SEBI's alleged consent, directing the parties to approach the Learned Single Judge promptly. Case-Laws SEBI Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301345