https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301328 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It concluded that the company did not deliberately mislead investors with the announcement about the export order, attributing the price increase to other corporate announcements. The Tribunal found that the company reasonably informed the public about the non-materialization of the order and determined that the promoters' share sales did not breach regulations. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Mar 2022 13:14:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301328 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It concluded that the company did not deliberately mislead investors with the announcement about the export order, attributing the price increase to other corporate announcements. The Tribunal found that the company reasonably informed the public about the non-materialization of the order and determined that the promoters' share sales did not breach regulations. Case-Laws SEBI Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301328